WHO ARE YOU? THE STORY OF IDENTITY
WHO ARE YOU?
Salutations
dear reader,
Here in the
being human blog, I try to explore various themes of the human condition but
this has led to some weird questions being asked. I have already written posts
about “what is a human being” and another about “Existence and the purpose of
existence” and today I bring another weird question we rarely ask ourselves but
is hard to answer. Today on the platter is the question “WHO ARE YOU?”
In modern
times, Individualism has become mainstream. Wherever you go whether social
media or on the streets or wherever, the saying “BE YOURSELF” is treasured and
beloved and for many it is taken as a fact, the true way to live life. It’s not
only in modern times. In Ancient Greece, at the entrance of the temple of
Apollo was the saying “gnΕthi seauton”, which is more infamous for its English
translation “KNOW THYSELF”.
Humans seem to be obsessed with personal identity but most
people cannot answer the question “WHO AM I?”.
It is not that most people are too stupid to answer this question. It’s
that this question is too hard to answer. Trying to trace what makes a person
who they are is actually hard. So what makes you, you. Is it your actions or
your body or your memories? What makes person who they are, is a question
pondered by our greatest minds but no one has reached a conclusion.
So do not let this blog post make you reach a conclusion on
your own personal identity. From my research, here is what I could get on the
issue of personal identity and the answer to the question “WHO AM I?”. Here are
two theories trying to answer this question.
A. BODY THEORY
So a group of philosophers came up with on how to explain personal
identity. So these philosophers used a principle that comes easily to the mind.
They propose we are who we are because of our bodies. We don’t share our bodies
with anyone and no one in the world has our body and we can’t switch our bodies
with anyone, our bodies seem like the only constant in our existence.
But problems do arise from this train of thought. Our bodies are not actually
constant, they undergo various changes every day, every hour, every minute and
every second. Our bodies are subject to growth, I am not in the same body that
I was in when I was 12 years old, my body went through various changes since
then. So does that mean am now a different person then, to the person I am now.
So are we who we are because of our bodies, not really as we can see.
Personally for me and for most people, their identity stretches farther than
just their bodies. So here is where the second train of thought comes in.
B. MEMORY THEORY
Most people take their identities from the experiences and memories they
had, that’s what memory theory tries to explain. So in memory theory, PERSONAL
IDENTITY= YOUR MEMORIES.
This sounds really simple and true, right? No one has the same memories
as you. No one has seen life in your perspective right? So it is true we are
our memories. Not actually, memories and perspective are very malleable and can
be farther from the truth. For example; Adolf Hitler saw himself as a hero of
the superior Aryan race, then if his memories tell him he is a hero does it
mean he is actually a hero, NO it does not.
Also memories can be lost completely when a person gets severe mental and
neurological illness or trauma, take an example of people with dementia, most
forget their memories but does that mean they are different people from before
because they lost their memories. They still inhabit the same bodies they had
before. The same bodies that cared, that worked, that fought in that person’s
life but since they lost their memories, are they completely different people?
C. MY TAKE ON PERSONAL IDENTITY
The above theories try to explain personal identity but they both have
their weaknesses, so does it mean that personal identity is a lie and there is
no such thing as being yourself. Most will deny this and will try to explain
identity on a plethora of other criteria like;
· A person’s dreams
· A person’s actions
· A person accomplishments
· A person’s social and economic status
· And many others
So how about those criteria, are we going to neglect them? Most of the
above criteria also have their respective weaknesses. Take for example a person’s
dreams, actions and status, these are too shallow to become a basis for
creating someone’s identity not only that the above criteria are also malleable and
can change. For example, if Kim Kardashian’s social status changes all of a
sudden, does it mean she is a different person even if she has the same memories
and she is in the same body.
Personal Identity is starting to feel like a real head scratcher. At this point, most of you won’t even care about identity anymore but the thing is personal
identity plays a big role in society. Most responsibilities and legal agreements
depend on personal identity. Like for example you have the obligation to pay a
loan and the bank recognizes you but since there is no real you since your
identity is not a constant philosophically speaking, does it mean you can avoid
paying the loan since you are a different person from the person who took the
loan in the distant past.
Now most of you, dear readers might feel confused or just bored by the
long discussion about identity but here is my take on identity. In most Buddhists
beliefs, the universe and everything in it including people and their
identities are ever changing, they call this “ANICCA” or impermanence.
So trying to stick to one factor as a reason for personal identity might
be futile. Maybe we should recognize that we are ever changing and that our
personalities are also subject to this change. So my take is that maybe human
identity is like a river, rivers have three stages: the upper course, middle
course and lower course. These 3 stages have different characteristics like
erosional power, etc. But no matter in what course the river is in, it’s the
same river. Maybe our lives and identities are like these rivers, we experience
ever changing bodies, dreams, actions and even memories but we are still
ourselves. Maybe our identities are should be based on impermanence and change.
That’s what I think but am not a philosopher or scientist or anything of that
thought, but that is my take on personal identity.π
π
Me 13 years old versus me 16 years old. Looks like two different people
because of my bodily changes but also my dreams, ideas and even my
understanding of the world are different but these two are all me.
So that is my conclusion on identity, humans change and grow and that’s who
we are, our changes and growth. If you want to understand more on the subject of
personal identity watch the video below:
Thank you for reading. If you like todays topic and what the blog talks
about, you can support the blog by commenting, advertising and contacting the
author, it is appreciated.
Cool π
ReplyDelete